Attention Advertisers: Taking An Ad Away Will Keep The “Ped” Away

John “Ped” Pilati

This is a friendly reminder of who you (the advertisers) are supporting. I honestly have no clue why all of you (the advertisers) do. The whole situation has me wondering and concerned. Hmmmm….if someone supports a pedofile. What does that make them? I think the story is bigger than just “Ped”, and even more than “Head and Ped”. I wonder? Remember……Tick Tock!

https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-11th-circuit/1548906.html

The Probation Office prepared a Presentence Investigation Report (PSI).   According to the PSI, Pilati conducted drug tests on the individuals named in the indictment, and he fondled their genitalia while administering the tests.   At the time of the offenses, one of the victims was under the age of 18.   Specifically, the PSI stated that A.Y., the victim in Count Four, was 17 years old when Pilati “strok[ed] A.Y.’s testicles, concentrating on the area between his penis and his testicles,” and “then held A.Y’s penis while he urinated into the cup” for drug testing.

The magistrate judge then sentenced Pilati to 42 months’ imprisonment and 1 year of supervised release. 

The Head and Ped Show

I woke up this morning, and was driving to work. The fog was do dense and hard to see. The fog got me to thinking of how many people do not see, and are blinded about this situation. Nobody wants to really open his/her eyes to what’s going on and taking a stand. Turn your light on and defeat this corrupt darkness that has infested our small town with these individuals. Russellville doesn’t deserve to be in the dark. The town deserves to shine, but it cannot as long as people keep feeding this evil.

I am “The Informer” aka Linchpin. All people that support and have dealings with these 2 corrupt and sick individuals will be subject to being posted on this site. “The Informer” asks you this. Think. Do you think that “YOU” have/had dealings with these individuals? Yes? Maybe? Well your right. I know. I am watching. This includes individuals, politicians, businesses, etc., and you all will be held accountable. Tick Tock!

Wood (Ruff Ruff)

Darren “Head” Woodruff

I do not want to get aHEAD of myself and forget the “HEAD” of the situation. The portfolio I have is full of this so called man (if you can call him that). No lies, but all truth. The truth will be revealed in small pieces so that everyone can soak it in. Darren Wood (ruff ruff)….your sins have come to find you, and since you are a so called preacher (cough cough). I hope and pray that the Lord has led you that way, but if any way that he hasn’t, and your doing this all for show. I would (if I were you) go to the altar (even if its you own home) and confess your sins before “The Father”. I would not dare and stand up and preach, or if I was a pastor allow you to preach in my pulpit with all the unjust things that you have committed. A Bible verse the weekend before you preach will not do it before a Holy God. Repent and thou shall be forgiven. I hope and pray you know the Lord in your heart. I really do, but your fruits that you show publicly are not that of the vine. I know all Wood (ruff ruff), and remember the truth will set you free.

The other news that I have gathered with factual evidence is Wood (ruff ruff) is going to run for mayor. This could be the most embarrassing event in Russellville history. A corrupt businessman with zero integrity and below zero character run for such an office.

I hear that his faithful companion dog Abraham is going to be his campaign manager. I believe that’s the only way he can garner any votes is because of that precious dog. Honestly I feel sorry for Abraham. He is being used for votes, and thats sad….gosh thats not even justice for the dog. A better word is (sorry) even on Wood (ruff ruff) standards.

I can see the slogan now…..”I am answering your call”, but the only thing he has done as district 2 councilman is “fail to act and respond on his campaign promises”. The thing is people are scared of him (including our elected councilmen that are with him including the mayor) because they are afraid Pilati (Ped) will write an article about them in the Franklin (pedofile) Press if they speak up.

Stand up and fight for your districts Mr. Mayor, Mr. Palmer, Mr. Cummings, Mr. Hamilton and Mr. Harris. I know you have all the facts. Band together and fight together for your voters, because district 2 is not being represented. Its all personal with Wood (ruff ruff), and its 4-1 odds. I would take that bet. During council meetings I can tell you are all afraid. I am not calling you out. I am just letting you know not to be scared of this clown. Wood (ruff ruff) runs his mouth all the time. He is all bark and no bite. I believe Abraham would be a better councilman than Wood (ruff ruff). I am asking you to do what is right for the city of Russellville. We can do better, and deserve better than being the laughing stock of Northwest Alabama.

Yes……I almost forgot. Stop advertising good money with the FRANKLIN COUNTY (PEDOFILE PRESS). ADVERTISERS AND POLITICIANS……..SO MANY WAYS TO GET YOUR WORD OUT. “THE FRANKLIN COUNTY TIMES” ARE ACTUALLY JOURNALISTS AND A PLATFORM THAT ALL PEOPLE SHOULD ADVERTISE WITH. YES….I AM PLUGGING AND ENDORSING THEM. SUBSCRIBE TO THEM AND GIVE THEM YOUR MONEY.

TAKE A STAND!

I AM THE INFORMER, AND I AM JUST GETTING STARTED. BUCKLE UP. I WILL HOLD EVERYONE ACCOUNTABLE THAT KEEPS SILENT WITH WOOD (RUFF RUFF) AND ADVERTISING AND FUNDING “THE PEDOFILE PRESS”.

I AM WATCHING.

I AM CALLING ON THE MAYOR, MR. PALMER, MR. CUMMINGS, MR. HAMILTON, AND MR. HARRIS (YES….WOOD (RUFF RUFF) IS NOT INCLUDED) TO BE MEN AND DO WHAT IS RIGHT. MAKE A DIFFERENCE, BECAUSE RUSSELLVILLE IS COUNTING ON YOU.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JOHN PILATI

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOHN PILATI, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-11978 D.C. Docket No. 07-00082-CR-VEH-JEO

Decided: December 17, 2010

The full PUBLIC article is here at https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-11th-circuit/1548906.html if you want to read the whole court document in full. The below excerpt from the docket made me feel dirty enough to go take a shower.

The supporters, and the individuals that give money to “The Franklin Free Press” should be ashamed of associating and advertising with this sick individual.

Advertising dollars are being used as he goes and photographs your children at school. He might have someone go take them, but it doesn’t take the fact away that he will be in possession of the photos for the rest of his life. Think about it people? Are you all that naive?

I. BACKGROUND

Pilati was charged with five misdemeanor counts of willfully depriving individuals of their right to be free from unreasonable searches by one acting under color of law, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 242.   Specifically, the grand jury charged Pilati, who was employed as the District Attorney in Franklin County, Alabama at the time of the offenses, with the following conduct:  (1) Pilati fondled the scrotum and penis of S.T.;  (2) Pilati fondled the testicles, penis, and buttocks of J.H.;  (3) Pilati forced A.M. to disrobe until he was completely naked and fondled his scrotum and buttocks;  (4) Pilati stroked the testicles of A.Y.;   and (5) Pilati forced D.M. to disrobe until he was completely naked and touched his genitals.   Pilati pleaded not guilty to all counts.

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 58(b)(3)(A), Pilati consented to be tried before a magistrate judge and specifically waived trial before a district judge.   The magistrate judge conducted a jury trial, and the jury found Pilati guilty on all counts.

The Probation Office prepared a Presentence Investigation Report (PSI).   According to the PSI, Pilati conducted drug tests on the individuals named in the indictment, and he fondled their genitalia while administering the tests.   At the time of the offenses, one of the victims was under the age of 18.   Specifically, the PSI stated that A.Y., the victim in Count Four, was 17 years old when Pilati “strok[ed] A.Y.’s testicles, concentrating on the area between his penis and his testicles,” and “then held A.Y’s penis while he urinated into the cup” for drug testing.

In its written objections to the PSI, the Government asserted that Pilati must be required to register under SORNA as a condition of supervised release.   Pilati objected to the recommendation of SORNA registration, asserting that “a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 242 with underlying sexual contact would not trigger any sexual offender registration requirements.”   Neither Pilati nor the Government included any written objection to the PSI’s statement that A.Y. was 17 years old at the time of the offense.

At the sentencing hearing, the magistrate judge heard argument regarding whether SORNA registration was required given the fact Pilati was not convicted of a “sex offense.”   Pilati asserted that because the jury convicted him of deprivation of civil rights and not a “sex offense,” SORNA registration was not required.   He contended that SORNA required a specific finding by the jury that the defendant committed a sexual offense.   Pilati’s argument regarding SORNA registration was not based on the age of the victim.   The magistrate judge overruled Pilati’s objection that his underlying offense, 18 U.S.C. § 242, did not require registration, concluding that a separate factual finding by the jury of specific intent to commit a sexual offense was not required for sentencing purposes.   The magistrate judge made a separate finding that he found “beyond a reasonable doubt that the offense conduct did involve the allegation and abusive sexual conduct as is stated in the [PSI].” The magistrate judge noted that SORNA provided the term “sex offender” included anyone who had committed a specified offense against a minor, which in turn incorporated any conduct that by its nature is a sex offense against a minor.   See 42 U.S.C. § 16911.   The magistrate judge found that “Count Four, dealing with the minor A.Y.,” was a sex offense against a minor, and thus Pilati was required to register under SORNA.   Neither Pilati nor the Government objected to the magistrate judge’s statement that A.Y. was a minor.

The magistrate judge then sentenced Pilati to 42 months’ imprisonment and 1 year of supervised release.   As a special condition of supervised release, the magistrate judge ordered Pilati to register as a sex offender within three days of his release.   After imposing the sentence, the magistrate judge inquired if there were any objections from any party as to the findings of fact other than those previously stated for the record.   Neither Pilati nor the Government had any further objections.

Pilati appealed to the district court, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3402, raising only one issue:  “Was it error for the court to order [Pilati] to register as a sex offender under the facts of this case?”   Pilati’s argument was twofold, focusing on the victim’s age.   He asserted (1) there was no proof that A.Y. was a minor at the time of the offense, and (2) the magistrate judge had not required the jury to make a specific finding that A.Y. was a minor.   Pilati asserted that under SORNA, the jury was required to make a finding of the victim’s age.

The district court affirmed the magistrate judge’s sentence.   The district court determined that while Pilati had objected to the SORNA registration requirement at sentencing, he did so on the basis he had not been convicted of a sexual offense.   Pilati challenged for the first time on appeal to the district court the lack of a specific finding regarding the age of the victim.   The district court concluded, inter alia, that Pilati failed to object to the PSI’s statement that A.Y. was a minor, and thus had admitted it for sentencing purposes.   Pilati now appeals to this Court.

https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-11th-circuit/1548906.html